comment
authorJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:13 +0000 (13:40 -0400)
committerJoey Hess <joeyh@joeyh.name>
Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:40:13 +0000 (13:40 -0400)
doc/bugs/reports_file___34__modified__34___whenever_it_is_not/comment_11_f8a54670d8eaf00624e9b8f85e803864._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/doc/bugs/reports_file___34__modified__34___whenever_it_is_not/comment_11_f8a54670d8eaf00624e9b8f85e803864._comment b/doc/bugs/reports_file___34__modified__34___whenever_it_is_not/comment_11_f8a54670d8eaf00624e9b8f85e803864._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ea0faa1
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="joey"
+ subject="""comment 11"""
+ date="2022-09-22T17:38:45Z"
+ content="""
+Yeah, a whole git-annex test run with stalldetection set would have found
+this bug. Which seems a bit heavy-weight for the test suite to try as a
+separate pass by default. But then again, stalldetection does significantly
+change how git-annex operates since it has to fork off child processes that
+it can kill when they stall.
+"""]]